Black Holes as Quantum Computing Tools for Advanced Extraterrestrial Intelligence

I. Introduction

The proposition that advanced extraterrestrial intelligences (ETI) might exploit black holes (BHs) as tools for quantum computation emerges at a fascinating nexus of theoretical astrophysics, quantum information science, general relativity, and the ongoing search for technosignatures. Black holes represent the most extreme objects predicted by Einstein’s theory of general relativity, governed by physical laws presumed to be universal. This universality makes them compelling candidates for a convergent technology – an ultimate computational substrate that any sufficiently advanced civilization might independently discover and utilize. Decades of theoretical investigation have revealed that black holes possess the maximum possible entropy, and thus information storage capacity, for a given size, saturating fundamental physical bounds. Furthermore, they are conjectured to process information at speeds approaching the limits imposed by quantum mechanics. Should an ETI attain a stage of technological maturity corresponding to Kardashev Type II (harnessing the energy output of a star) or Type III (harnessing the energy output of a galaxy), the exploitation of these extraordinary properties seems a logical, perhaps inevitable, step. This could involve the creation and manipulation of microscopic black holes, leveraging their unique characteristics to build quantum computers of unparalleled density and power. Such hypothetical devices, however, would not be silent; quantum effects dictate that they must radiate energy via the Hawking mechanism, potentially producing detectable technosignatures in the form of high-energy neutrinos or photons.

The very idea of searching for ETI by looking for the byproducts of their black hole computers represents a significant conceptual shift in the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence (SETI). Traditional SETI has largely focused on detecting intentional communication signals, such as radio waves, assuming ETI wish to make contact and use channels familiar or accessible to us. The black hole computing hypothesis, however, relies on the universality of physics – specifically gravity and quantum mechanics. The Hawking radiation associated with microscopic black holes is not an intentional signal but an inevitable physical consequence of their existence and operation. Because gravity couples universally, even an ETI composed of matter entirely unknown to us (a “dark” civilization interacting with our sector only gravitationally) would still produce detectable standard model particles like neutrinos and photons via Hawking radiation if they utilized black hole computers. This broadens the potential scope of SETI significantly, moving beyond assumptions about ETI communication strategies or composition, and towards detecting the fundamental physical signatures of advanced computation itself. Instruments like the IceCube Neutrino Observatory are already sensitive to the particle energies expected from such sources, making this a potentially viable, albeit challenging, search strategy.

This report provides a comprehensive survey of the theoretical foundations, potential engineering pathways, and observational prospects related to the use of black holes as quantum computing devices by advanced ETI. We delve into the established principles of black hole thermodynamics and information theory, including the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy, Hawking radiation, and the resolution of the information paradox through concepts like the Page curve and quantum extremal islands. We explore modern theoretical frameworks, such as the quantum N-portrait and the theory of saturons, which provide a microscopic basis for understanding black holes as maximal information processors and suggest a convergent technological trajectory towards their use. The report examines speculative mechanisms for the artificial creation and manipulation of microscopic black holes, considering constraints from particle physics experiments like the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) and theoretical possibilities involving extra dimensions or large numbers of particle species. We investigate the computational properties of black holes, particularly their role as fast scramblers of quantum information , and discuss potential input/output mechanisms, including the intriguing ER=EPR conjecture. A significant focus is placed on the potential technosignatures generated by Hawking radiation, specifically high-energy neutrinos and gamma rays, and the current observational limits imposed by instruments like IceCube, Fermi-LAT, H.E.S.S., and the future potential of the Cherenkov Telescope Array (CTA). Finally, we synthesize these threads into a structured research plan aimed at advancing our theoretical understanding, refining observational search strategies, and critically evaluating the central hypothesis that black holes represent an optimal and perhaps universal computing platform for any sufficiently advanced intelligence. The ultimate goal is to provide a rigorous, state-of-the-art assessment of this speculative but physically grounded concept, pushing the boundaries of our thinking about both fundamental physics and the search for life beyond Earth.

II. Black Holes, Information, and Thermodynamics: The Foundation

The theoretical basis for considering black holes as computational devices rests firmly on decades of progress in understanding their relationship with thermodynamics and information theory. These connections reveal black holes not merely as gravitational endpoints but as objects possessing extraordinary informational properties that push against the fundamental limits of physics.

Bekenstein-Hawking Entropy and the Bekenstein Bound

The modern understanding began with Jacob Bekenstein’s revolutionary proposal in 1973 that black holes possess entropy proportional to the area A of their event horizon. This idea arose from analogies between black hole mechanics (like the non-decreasing area theorem for merging black holes) and the laws of thermodynamics. Bekenstein argued that the horizon area acts as a measure of the information irretrievably lost to an external observer when matter falls into the black hole. This led to the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy formula, S_{BH} = k_B A / (4 L_P^2), where L_P = \sqrt{G\hbar/c^3} is the Planck length and k_B is Boltzmann’s constant (often set to 1 in theoretical contexts, giving S_{BH} = A / (4G\hbar)). The entropy associated with even a stellar-mass black hole is colossal; for a solar mass BH, S_{BH} \sim 10^{77} k_B, vastly exceeding the entropy of the progenitor star.

Crucially, Bekenstein also formulated a universal upper bound on the entropy S that can be contained within any region of space with radius R and total energy E: S \le 2\pi k_B E R / (\hbar c). This Bekenstein bound implies that there is a maximum information density allowed by physics. Black holes are unique in that they appear to saturate this bound; no other known physical system can store as much information within a given region. In essence, a black hole represents the ultimate compressed information storage device allowed by nature.

The physical reality of this entropy was initially debated, but received strong support from string theory in 1996 when Strominger and Vafa successfully calculated the entropy of certain supersymmetric (extremal) black holes by counting their microscopic quantum states (microstates) using D-brane techniques. Their result precisely matched the Bekenstein-Hawking area formula, providing compelling evidence that the macroscopic entropy has a statistical mechanical origin rooted in a vast number of underlying quantum degrees of freedom, even if those degrees are hidden behind the horizon. This confirmed that a black hole’s entropy S_{BH} = \ln N_{states}, where N_{states} is the number of microstates consistent with the macroscopic parameters (mass, charge, angular momentum) of the black hole.

Hawking Radiation and Evaporation

Stephen Hawking’s landmark 1974 calculation added another profound layer to the connection between black holes, thermodynamics, and quantum mechanics. By applying quantum field theory in the curved spacetime background of a black hole, Hawking demonstrated that black holes are not truly black but emit thermal radiation, now known as Hawking radiation. This radiation arises from quantum vacuum fluctuations near the event horizon, where particle-antiparticle pairs are constantly created. If one particle falls into the black hole while the other escapes, the escaping particle carries away positive energy, causing the black hole to lose mass. To an external observer, this process appears as thermal emission with a characteristic blackbody temperature, the Hawking temperature T_H = \hbar c^3 / (8\pi G k_B M), inversely proportional to the black hole’s mass M.

This result has several critical implications. First, it confirms that black holes behave as thermodynamic objects with a well-defined temperature related to their entropy and mass through the first law of black hole mechanics. Second, it implies that black holes must evaporate over time. The timescale for evaporation is extremely long for astrophysical black holes (much longer than the age of the universe for stellar-mass BHs) but becomes very short for microscopic black holes. A black hole with a mass M evaporates completely in a time \tau \propto G^2 M^3 / (\hbar c^4), scaling as M^3. For instance, a BH with an initial mass around 5 \times 10^{14} g (or 5 \times 10^{11} kg) would be evaporating today, roughly 13.8 billion years after the Big Bang. Third, the Hawking radiation is predicted to be “democratic” in particle species: a black hole emits all types of fundamental particles (photons, neutrinos, electrons, quarks, etc.) whose rest mass energy is less than or comparable to k_B T_H, with emission rates governed primarily by the particle’s spin and the available phase space, modified by energy-dependent greybody factors that account for the spacetime curvature barrier. This means very hot, microscopic black holes would radiate a cocktail of high-energy standard model particles. The reality of Hawking radiation, though not directly observed from astrophysical black holes due to their extremely low temperatures, has received indirect support from analogue experiments in systems like Bose-Einstein condensates (BECs) and nonlinear optical fibers, where artificial event horizons (e.g., sonic horizons) have been created and shown to emit thermal spectra of corresponding excitations (phonons or photons). Steinhauer’s experiments with BECs, for example, reported observation of spontaneous Hawking radiation and entanglement between the particle pairs created at the sonic horizon.

The Information Paradox and Its Resolution

Hawking’s discovery immediately led to the famous black hole information paradox. If a black hole forms from a pure quantum state (e.g., the collapse of a star described by a single wavefunction) and then evaporates completely into purely thermal Hawking radiation (a mixed state characterized only by temperature), then information about the initial state appears to be lost. This violates a fundamental principle of quantum mechanics: unitarity, which demands that the evolution of a closed system preserves information (pure states evolve to pure states). Hawking initially argued that information was indeed lost, challenging the foundations of quantum theory.

However, decades of theoretical work strongly suggest that information is not lost but is subtly encoded in the Hawking radiation. Physicists like Gerard ‘t Hooft, Leonard Susskind, and John Preskill argued that unitarity must hold, implying that the outgoing radiation cannot be perfectly thermal but must contain correlations that carry information about what fell into the black hole. Don Page made a crucial contribution in 1993 by analyzing the entanglement entropy of the Hawking radiation. He argued that if evaporation is unitary, the entropy of the radiation should initially increase (as entangled pairs are created with one falling in and one escaping) but must eventually decrease back to zero as the black hole disappears and the radiation purifies itself. This expected behavior is described by the Page curve. The turnaround point, known as the Page time, occurs roughly when the black hole has evaporated about half of its initial mass (or entropy). Before the Page time, very little information is accessible in the radiation; after the Page time, the correlations become stronger, and information begins to emerge.

Reproducing the Page curve theoretically became a major goal in quantum gravity research. A significant breakthrough occurred around 2019 with the development of the “island” paradigm, primarily within the context of the AdS/CFT correspondence. This approach involves refining the calculation of the entanglement entropy of the radiation using the concept of quantum extremal surfaces (QES) – surfaces that extremize a generalized entropy functional including both area and quantum field entropy contributions. The key insight is that when calculating the entropy of the radiation region \mathcal{R} far from the black hole, one must sometimes include a disconnected region I (the “island”) inside the black hole interior. The entropy is then given by minimizing the generalized entropy S_{gen}(\mathcal{R} \cup I) = \frac{Area(\partial I)}{4G_N} + S_{matter}(\mathcal{R} \cup I) over possible islands I, where \partial I is the boundary of the island (a QES). At early times, the minimum corresponds to no island (I = \emptyset), and the entropy grows linearly, matching Hawking’s result. However, after the Page time, a non-trivial island inside the black hole contributes, and the minimized generalized entropy starts to decrease, precisely reproducing the Page curve. This formalism, supported by calculations involving replica wormholes, suggests that the information is preserved because the outgoing radiation remains entangled with the degrees of freedom inside the black hole (represented by the island).

The success of the island paradigm provides more than just a theoretical resolution; it offers a concrete mechanism for how information might be encoded and potentially retrieved. The entanglement between the radiation and the island implies that precise measurements on the collected Hawking radiation could, in principle, reveal information about the black hole’s internal state and its formation history. This strengthens the physical basis for considering black holes as information processing systems, as it suggests a pathway, however complex, for reading out the results of computations performed within or encoded by the black hole.

Holographic Principle and AdS/CFT

The peculiar scaling of black hole entropy with area (A) rather than volume (R^3) was a major inspiration for the holographic principle, proposed by ‘t Hooft and Susskind. This principle conjectures that the physics within any volume of space can be fully described by degrees of freedom residing on the boundary of that region, with a density not exceeding one degree of freedom per Planck area (L_P^2). A black hole’s event horizon acts as a holographic screen, encoding all the information about the interior.

The most concrete realization of the holographic principle is the Anti-de Sitter/Conformal Field Theory (AdS/CFT) correspondence, discovered by Juan Maldacena in 1997. This duality posits an exact equivalence between a theory of quantum gravity (specifically, string theory) in a d+1-dimensional AdS spacetime and a d-dimensional CFT living on its boundary. AdS/CFT provides a powerful theoretical laboratory for studying quantum gravity and black hole physics because difficult calculations in the gravitational theory (strong coupling) can often be mapped to more tractable calculations in the dual CFT (weak coupling), and vice versa. It has been instrumental in developing the tools, like the Ryu-Takayanagi formula for entanglement entropy and its quantum extensions leading to the island rule, that have provided recent insights into the information paradox. The correspondence also allows for studying phenomena like thermalization and phase transitions in black holes by mapping them to corresponding processes in the dual field theory.

Fundamental Limits of Computation

The connection between black holes and information naturally leads to questions about the ultimate physical limits of computation. Two key results are the Margolus-Levitin theorem and the Bekenstein bound. The Margolus-Levitin theorem, derived from the time-energy uncertainty principle, states that the maximum rate at which a quantum system with average energy E (above its ground state) can transition between orthogonal states is proportional to E/\hbar. Specifically, the time \Delta t required for such a transition is bounded by \Delta t \ge \pi\hbar / (2E). This sets a fundamental limit on the speed of elementary computational operations.

Seth Lloyd, in 2000, synthesized these ideas by considering a hypothetical “ultimate laptop” – a 1 kg mass confined to a 1 litre volume, maximally optimized for computation. He argued that the ultimate physical system for computation would be one that collapses into a black hole, as this configuration saturates both the Bekenstein bound for information density and the Margolus-Levitin bound for processing speed. Lloyd calculated that a 1 kg black hole (with radius \sim 10^{-27} m) could perform \sim E/(\pi\hbar) \times S \sim (Mc^2/\pi\hbar) \times (A k_B / 4 L_P^2) operations per second on its \sim 10^{16} bits (qubits) of information. Plugging in the numbers yields an astonishing processing rate of \sim 5 \times 10^{50} operations per second.

However, such a tiny black hole would have an extremely high Hawking temperature (T_H \sim 10^{23} K) and would evaporate via Hawking radiation in a mere \sim 10^{-19} seconds. This illustrates a crucial trade-off inherent in black hole computing: smaller black holes compute faster (higher T_H) but have vastly shorter lifetimes (\tau \propto M^3), while larger black holes are long-lived but compute much more slowly (lower T_H). This suggests that any practical application of black hole computing by an ETI would likely require mechanisms to stabilize the black hole against evaporation, perhaps by continuously feeding it mass and energy to maintain it at an optimal operating point – a balance between computational speed and longevity. Such active management implies a steady energy throughput, distinguishing these hypothetical devices from passively evaporating primordial black holes. Furthermore, the universality of the physical laws leading to these bounds – general relativity and quantum mechanics – implies that any sufficiently advanced civilization exploring the limits of computation would inevitably encounter the unique properties of black holes. This reinforces the idea that black holes might represent a convergent technological endpoint, a universally recognized optimal solution for maximal information processing.

III. The Quantum Nature of Black Holes: Towards Computation

While thermodynamics provides a macroscopic description, understanding how a black hole might function as a quantum computer requires delving into its microscopic quantum structure. Recent theoretical frameworks, notably the quantum N-portrait and the concept of saturons, offer compelling pictures of black holes as complex quantum systems ideally suited for information processing, further strengthening the rationale for their potential use by advanced ETI.

The Quantum N-Portrait: A Graviton Condensate

A significant step towards a microscopic quantum description of black holes was provided by Gia Dvali and Cesar Gomez through their “quantum N-portrait” model. In this picture, a black hole is not viewed primarily as a classical spacetime geometry but as a quantum mechanical bound state – specifically, a Bose-Einstein condensate (BEC) – of a very large number, N, of interacting soft gravitons. These constituent gravitons are characterized by a long wavelength \lambda \sim R \sim \sqrt{N} L_P, comparable to the Schwarzschild radius R of the black hole, and they interact weakly with a coupling strength \alpha_{gr} \sim 1/N. The number N is directly related to the black hole’s macroscopic properties: N \sim (R/L_P)^2 \sim M^2/M_P^2, where M_P is the Planck mass. Remarkably, this N also coincides with the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy, S_{BH} \sim N. Thus, the entropy arises naturally from the degeneracy of states available to the N constituent gravitons.

The classical spacetime geometry with its event horizon emerges as a collective, large-N effect, analogous to how classical fluid dynamics emerges from the quantum mechanics of many interacting molecules. Crucially, the N-portrait provides an intuitive quantum mechanism for Hawking radiation: it is interpreted as the slow quantum depletion of the graviton condensate. Interactions between the condensed gravitons (e.g., 2-to-2 scattering) can occasionally give one graviton enough energy to escape the collective binding potential, leading to particle emission. Despite the condensate itself being cold (effectively zero temperature), this leakage process naturally produces an approximately thermal spectrum with the correct Hawking temperature T_H \sim 1/\sqrt{N} L_P \sim 1/R. Because this description is inherently quantum mechanical, information is not lost; the state of the emitted quanta can, in principle, remain entangled with the quantum state of the remaining condensate, consistent with unitary evolution and providing a microscopic basis for the Page curve. The model also offers insights into other aspects of quantum gravity, such as the species problem (how the number of particle species affects gravity) and the idea of UV self-completion via classicalization, where high-energy scattering produces large-N states (like black holes) instead of probing arbitrarily short distances.

Saturons: Generalizing Maximal Information Density

Building on the insights from the N-portrait and other studies, Dvali introduced the concept of “saturons” – systems that saturate fundamental upper bounds on entropy or information capacity imposed by unitarity within a given quantum field theory (QFT). These bounds arise because an excessive density of states (entropy) would lead to violations of probability conservation (unitarity) in scattering processes.

Two key forms of the unitarity bound on entropy S are often cited :

1. S \lesssim 1/\alpha, where \alpha is the relevant coupling constant of the interactions responsible for the system’s binding or dynamics.
2. S \lesssim Area / G_{Goldstone}, where Area is a characteristic area scale of the system, and G_{Goldstone} is an effective gravitational constant associated with the universal Goldstone boson arising from the spontaneous breaking of Poincaré symmetry by the saturon state itself.

Black holes perfectly exemplify saturons in the context of gravity. Their Bekenstein-Hawking entropy S_{BH} = A / (4G_N) matches the second form of the bound, with the graviton acting as the relevant Goldstone mode and G_{Goldstone} = G_N (Newton’s constant). They also saturate the first bound, as the effective gravitational coupling at the horizon scale is \alpha_{gr} \sim 1/N \sim 1/S_{BH}.

Crucially, the concept of saturons extends beyond gravity. Dvali and collaborators have identified potential saturon candidates in various non-gravitational QFTs, including:

• Solitonic objects like Q-balls or vacuum bubbles in scalar field theories.
• Bound states in gauge theories, such as the color glass condensate in Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD).
• Bound states in models like the Gross-Neveu model.

These non-gravitational saturons, when they reach their maximal entropy limit, are predicted to exhibit properties remarkably similar to black holes: area-law entropy, thermal-like decay rates with temperature T \sim 1/R, information horizons, and information release timescales analogous to the Page time. This universality suggests that the physics governing maximal information processing is not exclusive to gravity but is a more general feature of QFT constrained by unitarity. The existence of these non-gravitational analogues provides a significant conceptual bridge. It implies that the complex physics associated with black hole information processing might be studied, simulated, or even experimentally realized in more accessible systems, potentially allowing ETI (or future human scientists) to understand and master the principles of saturon/BH computing before tackling the immense challenge of manipulating actual black holes.

Black Holes as Optimal Information Processors

While saturons generalize the concept of maximal information density, black holes remain unique as the most efficient information processors known within the framework of established physics. Their optimality stems from the universal nature and weakness of gravity. As argued by Dvali, the effective Goldstone coupling G_{Goldstone} associated with Poincaré symmetry breaking is minimized for a black hole, where it equals G_N. Any other saturon of the same size must have an effective coupling G_{Goldstone} \ge G_N; attempting to make it more efficient (lower G_{Goldstone}) would inevitably lead to gravitational collapse into a black hole.

This maximal efficiency connects directly back to the Bekenstein and Lloyd limits discussed earlier. Black holes achieve the highest possible information density (Bekenstein bound) and the fastest possible computation speed for their energy content (Lloyd limit) precisely because they represent the endpoint of gravitational collapse, where information capacity is maximized relative to energy/size. This inherent optimality strongly supports the convergence argument: any civilization relentlessly pushing the boundaries of computational efficiency will eventually encounter saturon-like physics and recognize black holes as the ultimate achievable limit, making them a likely target for development by Type II/III civilizations.

Fast Scrambling: Black Holes as Information Mixers

Beyond storage capacity, the dynamics of information within a black hole are also crucial for computation. Black holes are believed to be exceptionally fast “scramblers” of quantum information. Proposed by Hayden and Preskill in 2007, scrambling refers to the process by which information initially localized in a subsystem becomes rapidly distributed and hidden within the complex correlations among the entire system’s degrees of freedom. They showed that if information (e.g., a quantum diary) is thrown into an old black hole (one past its Page time and thus highly entangled with its previously emitted radiation), that information is effectively re-emitted in the Hawking radiation almost instantaneously, on a timescale known as the scrambling time, t_{scr}.

The scrambling time for a black hole is conjectured to be logarithmically short in terms of the black hole’s entropy (or number of degrees of freedom N): t_{scr} \sim (\hbar / k_B T_H) \log S_{BH} \sim R \log R in Planck units. This is extraordinarily fast compared to typical thermalization times in macroscopic systems. Sekino and Susskind further conjectured that black holes are the fastest scramblers allowed by nature, saturating a fundamental bound on the rate of chaos development in quantum systems.

This rapid scrambling property is essential for the Hayden-Preskill information recovery scenario and potentially useful for certain types of quantum computation. A fast scrambler could efficiently thermalize inputs, generate pseudorandom quantum states, or perform quantum simulations of chaotic systems at unparalleled speeds. Recent theoretical and numerical work, including simulations in condensed matter analogues like chiral spin chains, continues to explore the dynamics of scrambling and its connection to black hole physics and quantum information protocols like teleportation.

Memory Burden Effect: Information Resists Decay

A more recent theoretical development potentially modifying the picture of black hole evaporation and information release is the “memory burden” effect. This concept, also originating from Dvali and collaborators, proposes that the quantum information stored within a system (like a black hole or a saturon) creates a back-reaction that actively resists the system’s decay.

The underlying idea is that information is stored in the excitation patterns of nearly gapless “memory modes” (like the soft graviton modes in the N-portrait or Goldstone modes in solitons). While creating these patterns costs energy, the high degeneracy of states means information can be stored efficiently. However, the presence of this stored information modifies the effective potential experienced by the system’s “master mode” (the collective mode responsible for decay, e.g., the overall condensate mode driving Hawking radiation). As the system decays (e.g., a black hole evaporates), the energy gaps associated with the memory modes increase due to the back-reaction from the remaining information.

This “burden” of carrying information makes further decay energetically less favorable. The effect becomes increasingly significant as the system shrinks. It is argued that for black holes, the memory burden effect becomes dominant around or after the Page time (when about half the initial mass/information remains). Consequently, the rate of Hawking evaporation could be significantly suppressed compared to the standard semiclassical calculation, potentially leading to the formation of long-lived, macroscopic remnants instead of complete evaporation. This provides an alternative mechanism for information preservation – it remains stored within the stabilized remnant or is released extremely slowly.

The memory burden effect, if correct, has significant implications. It offers a concrete microscopic mechanism for resolving the information paradox by halting or drastically slowing evaporation before information is lost. However, it also complicates the picture for technosignature searches. Models relying on the detection of the final burst of standard Hawking evaporation might need revision, as the memory burden could quench this final burst or replace it with the signature of a quasi-stable remnant. This highlights the importance of incorporating such quantum gravity effects into realistic models of ETI black hole computers and their potential observables.

The combination of the N-portrait, saturon theory, fast scrambling, and the memory burden effect paints a rich, albeit still developing, quantum picture of black holes. They emerge not just as passive endpoints of gravitational collapse but as dynamic, complex quantum systems operating at the fundamental limits of information storage and processing, providing a robust theoretical underpinning for their potential role as the ultimate computational devices for advanced civilizations.

Table 1: Milestones in Black Hole Information and Computation Theory

Reference (Year)	Key Contribution
Bekenstein (1973)	Proposed black hole entropy is proportional to horizon area (S_{BH} \propto A), establishing the concept of black holes as information-rich thermodynamic objects and formulating the Bekenstein bound on maximum entropy/information density.
Hawking (1974)	Predicted thermal Hawking radiation (T_H \propto 1/M) due to quantum effects, implying black holes evaporate and leading to the information paradox (apparent violation of unitarity).
Page (1993)	Argued information is preserved in Hawking radiation but released non-uniformly; derived the Page curve for entanglement entropy, showing information emerges primarily after the Page time (half-evaporation).
Strominger & Vafa (1996)	Provided a microscopic derivation of S_{BH} for extremal black holes using string theory (D-brane state counting), confirming entropy arises from quantum microstates.
‘t Hooft & Susskind (~1993)	Proposed the holographic principle, inspired by BH entropy, stating that physics in a volume can be encoded on its boundary surface.
Maldacena (1997)	Discovered the AdS/CFT correspondence, a concrete realization of holography linking quantum gravity in AdS space to a boundary CFT, providing a powerful tool for studying quantum gravity and black hole information.
Lloyd (2000)	Calculated ultimate physical limits to computation, using black holes as the limiting case that saturates bounds on information density (Bekenstein) and processing speed (Margolus-Levitin), establishing BHs as theoretical “ultimate computers”.
Hayden & Preskill (2007)	Showed black holes are “fast scramblers,” mixing information extremely rapidly (timescale \sim R \log R), relevant for information recovery and potential computational tasks.
Dvali & Gomez (~2012)	Introduced the “quantum N-portrait” model: a black hole as a Bose-Einstein condensate of N \sim S_{BH} soft gravitons, explaining entropy and Hawking radiation (condensate depletion) microscopically.
Maldacena & Susskind (2013)	Proposed the ER=EPR conjecture, suggesting quantum entanglement between particles is geometrically realized as an Einstein-Rosen bridge (wormhole), potentially linking entanglement to spacetime connectivity.
Almheiri et al. (~2019)	Developed the “island” paradigm within AdS/CFT, using quantum extremal surfaces to calculate entanglement entropy of Hawking radiation and successfully reproduce the Page curve, resolving a major aspect of the information paradox.
Dvali (~2021)	Introduced “saturons” as systems saturating unitarity bounds on entropy, generalizing BH properties. Argued BHs are the most efficient (gravitational) saturons, reinforcing the convergence argument for advanced computation.
Dvali & Osmanov (2023)	Proposed that advanced ETI will likely use microscopic BHs as quantum computers, and calculated that the resulting Hawking radiation (neutrinos, photons) could be detectable by current instruments like IceCube, offering a new SETI technosignature.

IV. Engineering Black Hole Computers: Creation and Operation

While the theoretical foundations paint black holes as ideal computational substrates, the practical realization of such technology by an advanced ETI would involve overcoming immense engineering challenges related to their creation, manipulation, and stabilization. Understanding these challenges provides context for the feasibility of the concept and the nature of potential technosignatures.

Artificial Micro Black Hole Creation

The primary hurdle is the creation of microscopic black holes suitable for computation – likely in the mass range of 10^9 to 10^{12} kg, corresponding to high Hawking temperatures (MeV-TeV) suitable for fast processing but requiring stabilization.

The Energy Concentration Problem: Forming a black hole requires concentrating mass-energy M within its corresponding Schwarzschild radius R_s = 2GM/c^2. For a target mass of M \sim 10^{12} kg, the required energy is enormous (E = Mc^2 \sim 10^{29} J, comparable to the Sun’s output over several hours), and it must be compressed into an infinitesimally small region (R_s \sim 10^{-15} m, roughly the size of a proton).

Particle Collisions and the Planck Scale: The most commonly discussed method for artificial creation is through ultra-high-energy particle collisions. In standard 4-dimensional spacetime, the energy required to probe distances comparable to R_s for such small masses corresponds to the Planck energy scale, E_{Pl} = \sqrt{\hbar c^5 / G} \sim 10^{19} GeV. Achieving such center-of-mass energies would necessitate particle accelerators of cosmic proportions, far beyond any conceivable human technology or even that of a Type II civilization operating within standard physics.

Lowering the Threshold: TeV Gravity and Large Extra Dimensions (LED): A potential loophole arises in theories proposing physics beyond the Standard Model, particularly those involving extra spatial dimensions. The model by Arkani-Hamed, Dimopoulos, and Dvali (ADD) posits that gravity might propagate in n additional spatial dimensions, while Standard Model particles are confined to our 3+1 dimensional “brane”. In this scenario, the fundamental scale of gravity, M_D, could be much lower than the 4D Planck scale M_{Pl}, potentially as low as the TeV scale. The relationship is roughly M_{Pl}^2 \sim M_D^{n+2} R^n, where R is the size of the extra dimensions. If M_D \sim TeV, then collisions at TeV energies could potentially create microscopic black holes. This possibility motivated extensive searches at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC).

Constraints from the LHC: Experiments like ATLAS and CMS at the LHC have specifically searched for signatures predicted by TeV-scale gravity models, including the production of micro black holes. These signatures typically involve events with high particle multiplicity (from Hawking evaporation), large missing transverse energy (if gravitons escape into extra dimensions), or resonances corresponding to Kaluza-Klein excitations. To date, no such signals have been observed. These null results have placed stringent lower limits on the fundamental gravity scale M_D (typically many TeV, depending on the number of extra dimensions and specific model assumptions) and on the mass of any producible micro black holes (often excluding masses below 8-10 TeV). While not definitively ruling out LED, these constraints significantly reduce the parameter space where micro BH production would be accessible at LHC energies or slightly beyond. The persistent lack of evidence strongly suggests that if ETI are manufacturing black holes, they likely operate at energy scales far exceeding ours, characteristic of Type II or III capabilities, or possess knowledge of physics fundamentally different from the standard LED scenarios explored so far.

Lowering the Threshold: The N_{species} Argument: An alternative mechanism for lowering the effective Planck scale, proposed by Dvali, involves the number of distinct particle species (N_{sp}) in nature. Quantum corrections involving loops of many particle species can significantly renormalize the strength of gravity. Dvali argues that the true quantum gravity scale M_{eff} might be related to the 4D Planck scale M_{Pl} by M_{eff}^2 \sim M_{Pl}^2 / N_{sp}. Our Standard Model contains N_{sp} \approx 100 species. However, if there exists a vast “hidden sector” of particles interacting primarily gravitationally, N_{sp} could be much larger. In an extreme scenario with N_{sp} \sim 10^{32}, the effective gravity scale could drop to the TeV range, making micro BH production feasible even without large extra dimensions. This provides another theoretical avenue, suggesting that ETI advancements in fundamental particle physics (discovering hidden sectors) could unlock BH manufacturing capabilities.

Matter Compression: A conceptually different approach involves the direct compression of matter to densities exceeding the nuclear density until gravitational collapse occurs. This is how astrophysical black holes form from massive stars. An ETI might attempt this artificially, perhaps using megastructures to focus immense energy onto a small target (e.g., an asteroid or planetoid) to induce collapse. However, achieving the required densities and pressures artificially seems extraordinarily challenging, likely requiring energies and control far exceeding even the particle collision scenarios.

Input, Processing, and Output Mechanisms

Assuming an ETI can create and stabilize a micro black hole, how would they use it for computation? This involves mechanisms for inputting information, harnessing the black hole’s dynamics for processing, and retrieving the results.

Input: Information must be encoded into states that can be fed into the black hole. A plausible method involves preparing fundamental particles (photons, electrons, etc.) in specific quantum states (e.g., spin up/down for a qubit, specific polarization states) and precisely directing them across the event horizon. While the classical no-hair theorems state that isolated black holes are characterized only by mass, charge, and angular momentum, this does not hold at the quantum level. The specific quantum state of infalling matter does affect the microscopic state (the specific configuration of the N gravitons in the N-portrait, or the microstate within the ensemble) of the black hole, even if the macroscopic parameters change only slightly. An advanced ETI could thus “write” information into the black hole’s quantum state by controlling the quantum properties of the matter it feeds the hole.

Processing: The black hole’s intrinsic evolution acts as the processor. As established, black holes are fast scramblers, rapidly mixing any input information throughout their internal degrees of freedom. This scrambling process, driven by the complex quantum gravitational dynamics near the horizon, might not just be random thermalization. It could potentially be harnessed to perform specific computational tasks. For example, the evolution could simulate other complex quantum systems intractable by conventional means, or specific algorithms might be designed such that the scrambling dynamics effectively implement the desired quantum logic gates on the input states. The exact nature of this “computation” remains highly speculative but relies on the idea that the black hole’s evolution is a unitary quantum process that transforms input states to output states in a potentially useful way.

Output/Readout: Retrieving the computational result relies predominantly on decoding the information encoded in the outgoing Hawking radiation. As per the Page curve analysis and the island paradigm, this information is present in subtle quantum correlations within the radiation, particularly after the Page time. An ETI would need to collect a significant fraction of the emitted Hawking particles (potentially more than half the black hole’s initial entropy) and perform extremely complex quantum measurements and classical post-processing to decode these correlations and extract the result. This likely requires sophisticated quantum error correction techniques, perhaps developed through studying information release from analogue saturon systems. The inherent thermal nature of the radiation makes readout a formidable challenge.

ER=EPR and Wormhole Computing: A more exotic possibility for information processing and retrieval involves the ER=EPR conjecture. This conjecture posits an equivalence between quantum entanglement (EPR pairs) and geometric connections via Einstein-Rosen bridges (wormholes). If an ETI could create and manipulate pairs of entangled micro black holes, the ER=EPR correspondence suggests these black holes might be connected by a microscopic wormhole. Theoretical work suggests that specific interactions between the entangled systems could render these wormholes traversable for quantum information. This opens up speculative but potentially revolutionary possibilities: information could be teleported between entangled black hole “processors” through the wormhole, or results could perhaps be extracted via the wormhole connection without waiting for Hawking radiation, offering a potential shortcut compared to the slow process of radiation collection and decoding. The successful simulation of a traversable wormhole protocol on Google’s Sycamore quantum computer, while using a simplified model dual to AdS spacetime, provides a proof-of-principle that the underlying physics connecting entanglement, interactions, and traversable geometry might be realizable. If applicable to realistic black holes, ER=EPR could enable fundamentally different and potentially much faster architectures for black hole quantum computers.

Stability and Control

Beyond creation and I/O, maintaining the operational stability of a micro black hole computer is paramount.

Evaporation Control and Feeding: As discussed, micro black holes evaporate rapidly via Hawking radiation. A 10^{12} kg black hole (T_H \sim 100 GeV) evaporates in \sim 10^5 years, while a 10^9 kg black hole (T_H \sim 100 TeV) vanishes in only \sim 100 seconds. To function as a persistent computer, the evaporation must be counteracted. This necessitates a continuous feeding mechanism, supplying mass and energy to the black hole at a rate that balances the energy lost to Hawking radiation, maintaining a steady-state mass and temperature. The choice of operating mass/temperature would be a trade-off between computational speed (higher T_H) and the energy cost of feeding. This continuous energy throughput implies that ETI black hole computers would likely be persistent sources of high-energy radiation, potentially distinguishable from transient natural phenomena like PBH evaporation bursts.

Confinement and Safety: Physically manipulating and containing a microscopic black hole presents further challenges. If the black hole could be given a net electric charge (e.g., by feeding it charged particles), electromagnetic fields could potentially be used for levitation and control, analogous to a Penning trap. However, maintaining charge against preferential emission of charged particles via Hawking radiation and managing the intense radiation pressure would be complex. Concerns about runaway accretion are likely unfounded for microscopic black holes; studies conducted for LHC safety assessments concluded that such objects, even if stable, would decay or pass harmlessly through matter much faster than they could accrete significantly. Theoretical constructions of black hole microstates sometimes involve internal matter shells, suggesting complex internal structures might play a role in their stability or interaction.

The engineering hurdles associated with black hole computing are undeniably immense, likely requiring capabilities far beyond present human reach. However, the theoretical framework suggests that for a sufficiently advanced civilization pushing the fundamental limits of computation, the potential payoff in terms of information processing power might make overcoming these challenges a worthwhile, if not inevitable, endeavor.

V. Technosignatures: Detecting ETI Black Hole Technology

If advanced ETI are indeed utilizing microscopic black holes for computation or other purposes, the unavoidable physical processes involved, primarily Hawking radiation, could generate observable signals detectable across interstellar distances. Searching for these specific signatures represents a novel approach within SETI, focusing on the physical byproducts of extreme technology rather than intentional communication.

Hawking Radiation Signatures

The primary expected technosignature is the Hawking radiation emitted by the operational micro black holes.

Particle Content and Spectrum: As established, Hawking radiation is “democratic,” producing all fundamental particle species with rest mass m \lesssim k_B T_H. For black holes in the hypothetical operating range (M \sim 10^9 – 10^{12} kg), the Hawking temperature T_H ranges from TeV down to MeV. This means such black holes would copiously radiate photons, neutrinos (all flavors), electrons, positrons, and potentially muons, taus, and even quarks and gluons if T_H exceeds the QCD scale (\Lambda_{QCD} \sim 200 MeV).

The energy spectrum of directly emitted particles of species i follows a modified blackbody distribution : \frac{d^2 N_i}{dE dt} = \frac{\Gamma_i(M, E, s)}{2\pi\hbar} \frac{1}{\exp(E/k_B T_H) \pm 1} where s is the particle spin (+1 for fermions, -1 for bosons), and \Gamma_i(M, E, s) is the energy- and spin-dependent greybody factor, representing the probability that a particle with energy E escapes the black hole’s gravitational potential barrier. These factors distort the spectrum from a perfect blackbody shape, particularly at low energies. The peak energy of the emission is typically a few times k_B T_H.

Secondary Radiation and Photosphere Effects: The primary emitted particles, if unstable (like heavy leptons, quarks, gluons), will decay and/or hadronize, producing secondary fluxes of stable particles like photons, neutrinos, electrons, and positrons. These secondary spectra must be calculated using particle physics codes (like PYTHIA, Hazma, or specialized codes like BlackHawk) and convolved with the primary emission rates. This significantly modifies the final observable spectrum, often softening it compared to the primary emission.

Furthermore, if the Hawking temperature is sufficiently high (T_H \gtrsim 45 GeV for QED interactions, or T_H \gtrsim \Lambda_{QCD} for QCD interactions), the density of emitted particles near the horizon can become so large that they interact strongly, forming a “photosphere” or “atmosphere” around the black hole. This photosphere would thermalize the outgoing radiation, effectively reprocessing the high-energy primary spectrum into a lower-temperature thermal spectrum characteristic of the photosphere’s outer edge (where interactions cease, e.g., around T \sim m_e c^2 for QED or T \sim \Lambda_{QCD} for QCD). The formation of a photosphere could dramatically alter the expected technosignature, shifting the peak emission energy downwards (e.g., towards ~100 MeV gamma rays even for a TeV-temperature BH) and potentially masking the direct Hawking spectrum. Accurate modeling of technosignatures must account for these secondary production and potential photosphere effects.

Neutrino Technosignatures

Neutrinos offer a particularly promising channel for detecting ETI black hole activity due to their ability to travel vast interstellar and intergalactic distances without significant absorption or deflection.

Expected Flux and Detectability: Hawking radiation from MeV-TeV temperature black holes would produce neutrinos across a wide energy range. Dvali and Osmanov estimated the potential neutrino flux from hypothetical ETI black hole computing “farms”. They calculated that the IceCube Neutrino Observatory, the most sensitive high-energy neutrino detector currently operating, could potentially detect the integrated neutrino flux if a Type II civilization (controlling stellar energies) operates on the order of N_{BH}^{II} \sim 2.5 \times 10^3 to 4.2 \times 10^4 micro black holes, or if a Type III civilization (controlling galactic energies) operates N_{BH}^{III} \sim 2 \times 10^6 to 1.4 \times 10^8 such devices within its detectable range. While these numbers seem large, they might be plausible within the energy budgets of such advanced civilizations.

Observational Constraints: Current observations by IceCube have established a diffuse astrophysical neutrino flux, primarily consistent with extragalactic sources like blazars or star-forming galaxies. Searches for point sources have identified a few candidates (e.g., TXS 0506+056), but no anomalous signals strongly indicative of ETI activity or unexplained Hawking radiation have been found. These null results effectively place upper limits on the prevalence of large-scale ETI black hole computing activity in our galactic neighborhood or beyond, constraining the N_{BH}^{II} and N_{BH}^{III} parameters derived by Dvali & Osmanov. Searches for neutrinos from evaporating primordial black holes (PBHs) also provide relevant constraints, as the expected signal is similar. Recent interest has focused on whether rare ultra-high-energy neutrino events (PeV scale) detected by IceCube and KM3NeT could potentially originate from nearby PBH evaporations, a scenario that could overlap with ETI signatures if artificial BHs are involved.

Distinguishing Features: A potential neutrino technosignature might be distinguishable from astrophysical backgrounds by several characteristics:

1. Spatial Origin: A localized excess of high-energy neutrinos from a direction lacking a known energetic astrophysical counterpart (like a blazar or supernova remnant).
2. Spectral Shape: A spectrum consistent with (greybody-modified) thermal emission from a source with temperature T_H in the MeV-TeV range, potentially exhibiting a characteristic cutoff, differing from the power-law spectra typical of astrophysical accelerators.
3. Flavor Ratio: Hawking radiation should produce neutrino flavors roughly democratically (after oscillations, expecting close to a 1:1:1 ratio of \nu_e:\nu_\mu:\nu_\tau at Earth). Deviations from ratios expected from standard astrophysical sources (like pion decay dominated sources) could be a hint.
4. Temporal Behavior: While a maintained BH computer might be a steady source, any modulation in the feeding mechanism could lead to corresponding variations in the neutrino flux.

Gamma-Ray Technosignatures

Photons, particularly high-energy gamma rays, represent another key channel, complementary to neutrinos.

Advantages and Disadvantages: Gamma rays are generally easier to detect and localize than neutrinos, with numerous ground-based (H.E.S.S., MAGIC, VERITAS, HAWC, LHAASO) and space-based (Fermi-LAT) telescopes operating. However, the gamma-ray sky has significant astrophysical backgrounds, and high-energy photons can be absorbed by interactions with interstellar radiation fields (e.g., pair production on the cosmic microwave background or extragalactic background light), limiting the detection horizon, especially at TeV energies and above.

Expected Flux and Observational Limits: Similar flux calculations apply as for neutrinos, accounting for secondary production and potential absorption. Decades of searches for the gamma-ray bursts expected from the final stages of PBH evaporation provide the most relevant observational constraints. Instruments like Fermi-LAT (searching for MeV-GeV signals) and atmospheric Cherenkov telescopes like H.E.S.S. and HAWC (searching for TeV bursts) have placed stringent upper limits on the local rate density of PBH explosions (e.g., \mathcal{R} \lesssim 2000 \, \text{pc}^{-3} \, \text{yr}^{-1} from H.E.S.S. , and \mathcal{R} \lesssim 3400 \, \text{pc}^{-3} \, \text{yr}^{-1} from HAWC ). These limits constrain the number density of any objects producing similar terminal bursts, including potentially malfunctioning ETI black hole devices. Future instruments like the Cherenkov Telescope Array (CTA) promise significantly improved sensitivity, potentially pushing these limits down by another order of magnitude or enabling detection.

Distinguishing Features: A gamma-ray signal from an ETI black hole computer might be identified by:

1. Spectrum: A thermal-like spectrum with an exponential cutoff at E \sim \text{few} \times k_B T_H, distinct from the non-thermal power-law or broken power-law spectra common to astrophysical accelerators like pulsars or AGN jets. The potential presence of a photosphere could shift this peak to lower energies (~100 MeV).
2. Temporal Variability: Steady emission (from a maintained BH) or specific variability patterns linked to operation or feeding cycles, differing from the stochastic variability of many astrophysical sources.
3. Location: Association with a potential ETI host system (e.g., a star) or a location devoid of obvious astrophysical counterparts.
4. Multiwavelength Counterparts: A lack of emission at lower frequencies (radio, optical) might be expected unless the BH computer is embedded within a larger structure that produces waste heat.

Multimessenger Searches

Combining data from different messengers (neutrinos, photons, potentially gravitational waves) offers a powerful strategy to enhance sensitivity and reduce false positives.

Rationale and Platforms: Since black holes are expected to emit multiple particle types simultaneously via Hawking radiation, searching for coincident events in time and direction across different detectors can significantly suppress backgrounds. Networks like the Astrophysical Multimessenger Observatory Network (AMON) are designed to facilitate such real-time searches by correlating sub-threshold triggers from observatories like IceCube, HAWC, ANTARES, and others.

Signatures: A compelling multimessenger signature could involve the detection of a burst of high-energy neutrinos coincident with a gamma-ray burst exhibiting a thermal-like spectrum, originating from a direction lacking known astrophysical sources. Alternatively, a steady source detected in both neutrinos and gamma rays with a flux ratio consistent with the “democratic” emission expected from Hawking radiation could also be indicative of such technology.

Other Potential Observables

Beyond direct Hawking radiation products, other potential signatures exist:

• Waste Heat / Infrared Emission: If an ETI captures the high-energy Hawking radiation for power generation or to manage the environment around the BH computer, inevitable inefficiencies in energy conversion would lead to waste heat. This heat might be radiated thermally in the infrared spectrum. Searches for anomalous mid-infrared sources, similar to those conducted for Dyson spheres, could potentially detect the thermal glow of structures surrounding ETI black hole devices.
• Gravitational Waves (GWs): An isolated, evaporating black hole is not expected to be a strong source of GWs. However, GWs could be generated during the creation process if it involves energetic collisions or asymmetric collapse. Manipulation of black holes, such as merging two micro BHs as part of a computational process, would also produce GWs, though likely at very high frequencies and low amplitudes for the masses considered, making detection extremely challenging with current or near-future instruments.
• Creation Byproducts: The process used to manufacture the micro black holes (e.g., ultra-high-energy particle collisions) would likely produce its own distinct burst of radiation, potentially non-thermal and reflecting the nature of the input particles/energy, rather than the universal thermal signature of Hawking radiation. Detecting such anomalous, high-energy bursts unrelated to known astrophysical phenomena could be another indirect sign.

The “democratic” nature of Hawking radiation provides a key advantage for detection: regardless of the specific internal physics or composition of the ETI or their computer, the evaporation process itself should produce standard model particles like photons and neutrinos that our instruments can detect. This universality makes the search for Hawking radiation byproducts a potentially robust method for detecting advanced technological activity.

VI. The Case for Black Hole Computing: Optimality and Universality

The hypothesis that advanced ETI would utilize black holes for computation rests on the argument that these objects represent the ultimate physical limit for information processing, making them a likely convergent endpoint for any civilization seeking maximal computational power. Evaluating this claim requires comparing black holes to other potential high-density computing substrates and assessing the universality of the underlying physical principles.

Comparison with Alternative Computing Substrates

Neutron Stars (NS): Neutron stars are the collapsed cores of massive stars, representing matter compressed to nuclear densities (\sim 10^{17} – 10^{18} kg/m$^3$). Their extreme density has led to speculation about using “neutronium” (the hypothetical material composing NS interiors) as a substrate for computation, sometimes termed “computronium”. Neutron stars are indeed incredibly dense and possess immense gravitational fields. However, they fall short of black holes in several key aspects relevant to ultimate computation:

• Density and Information Limits: While extremely dense, neutron stars are still supported against further collapse by neutron degeneracy pressure and nuclear forces. Their density is orders of magnitude lower than that required to form a black hole of similar mass, and they do not saturate the Bekenstein bound on information density. A black hole packs the maximum possible information into a given region.
• Computational Speed Limits: While computations within neutron star matter might be rapid due to high densities, they would still be governed by the physics of nuclear matter interactions. Black holes, by potentially operating near the Planck scale and saturating the Margolus-Levitin bound, offer theoretically higher processing speeds per unit of energy.
• Quantum Gravity Effects: Computing with neutron stars would primarily leverage the properties of ultra-dense nuclear matter. Black hole computing, in contrast, inherently involves phenomena tied directly to quantum gravity: Hawking radiation, quantum scrambling at the event horizon, and potentially exotic effects like ER=EPR wormholes. This suggests black holes offer access to a fundamentally different, potentially more powerful computational regime linked to the unification of gravity and quantum mechanics, rather than just an extremely dense version of conventional matter computation.

Computronium: This term refers to a hypothetical form of matter engineered to be the optimal substrate for computation, maximizing processing power per unit of mass, volume, or energy. Various concepts have been proposed, from molecular nanotechnology arrangements to exotic states of matter. However, any form of computronium must obey the fundamental physical limits imposed by thermodynamics (Landauer’s principle on energy cost of information erasure ), quantum mechanics (Margolus-Levitin bound on speed ), and gravity (Bekenstein bound on information density ).

The crucial link is that black holes appear to be the physical realization of the theoretical endpoint of computronium. They are the unique objects known to simultaneously saturate the Bekenstein bound (maximum information density) and the Margolus-Levitin bound (maximum operations per unit energy). Therefore, according to our current understanding of physics, a black hole is the ultimate form of computronium – no hypothetical arrangement of ordinary matter could, in principle, outperform it in terms of fundamental computational density and efficiency.

The Convergence Argument

Several lines of reasoning support the idea that black hole computing might be a convergent technological outcome for sufficiently advanced civilizations:

1. Universality of Physics: The laws of general relativity, quantum mechanics, and thermodynamics that govern black hole properties (entropy, temperature, evaporation, information limits) are believed to be fundamental and universal. Any civilization developing physics to a sufficient level would inevitably discover these same laws and the unique status of black holes within them.
2. Fundamental Limits: As civilizations strive for ever-increasing computational power, they will inevitably push against the fundamental physical limits on information density and processing speed. Black holes represent the ultimate known physical systems that attain these limits. The drive for optimization would naturally lead towards exploring these limiting objects.
3. Saturon Pathway: The theory of saturons suggests a broader class of systems that maximize information content relative to their energy or size. Advanced civilizations might first learn to engineer and utilize non-gravitational saturons, gaining experience with the physics of maximal information density and processing. As they continue to optimize, they would find that gravitational saturons – black holes – offer the highest possible efficiency due to the universal nature of gravity, making them the ultimate target.
4. Resource Optimization: For computations requiring immense storage or processing power, potentially related to large-scale simulations, complex system modeling, or perhaps even aspects of consciousness or intelligence replication, black holes offer unparalleled efficiency in terms of computation per unit mass or energy. At some point in technological development, the energy and matter costs of scaling up conventional computing architectures might become prohibitive compared to investing in black hole-based systems.

Counterarguments and Challenges

Despite the compelling theoretical arguments, the case for black hole computing is not without significant challenges and potential counterarguments:

• Engineering Impracticality: The sheer difficulty of creating, stabilizing, feeding, controlling, and extracting information from microscopic black holes might render them practically unusable, even for highly advanced civilizations. The required energies and precision might be fundamentally unattainable or too hazardous.
• Information Retrieval Complexity: While the island paradigm suggests information is preserved and retrievable from Hawking radiation in principle, the actual process of decoding the subtle quantum correlations within potentially vast numbers of emitted particles might be computationally intractable itself, negating the benefits.
• Memory Burden and Remnants: If the memory burden effect significantly slows or halts evaporation after the Page time, the nature of the black hole as a computational device could change. A quasi-stable remnant might function differently, or perhaps cease to be useful for computation if its Hawking radiation output (the primary information channel) is quenched.
• Alternative Paradigms: It is always possible that ETI discover new laws of physics or entirely different computational paradigms that circumvent the limits associated with known physics, rendering black hole computing unnecessary or suboptimal. Perhaps stable, “safer” alternatives like neutron star-based computers, while less efficient according to current theory, prove sufficient for their needs. However, the universality arguments based on saturons and fundamental bounds make it less likely that the absolute limits represented by black holes could be easily surpassed.

In conclusion, while acknowledging the immense practical difficulties and theoretical uncertainties, the unique position of black holes at the apex of information density and processing efficiency, grounded in universal physical laws, provides a strong rationale for considering them as a potential convergent technology for highly advanced ETI. Their comparison with alternatives like neutron stars highlights the unique quantum gravitational phenomena they embody, suggesting a leap into a fundamentally different computational regime.

VII. Proposed Research Directions

To advance the study of black holes as potential quantum computing tools for ETI and to refine the search for associated technosignatures, a concerted, multidisciplinary research effort is required. This effort should span theoretical modeling, observational strategy development, and critical assessment of the core hypothesis.

Theoretical Modeling

1. Black Hole Quantum Information Processing: Further development of theoretical models is crucial. This includes:

• Refining Computational Models: Utilizing frameworks like the quantum N-portrait, saturon theory, or AdS/CFT analogues (e.g., SYK models) to simulate information processing within black holes. Moving beyond simple operations-per-second estimates to assess the potential for specific quantum algorithms or simulations.
• Input/Output Mechanisms: Investigating concrete mechanisms for “programming” black holes via controlled infall of quantum states and “reading out” results by decoding Hawking radiation, incorporating insights from the island/QES paradigm regarding information retrieval from correlations. Exploring the potential of ER=EPR wormhole connections for alternative information transfer or processing architectures.
• Memory Burden Dynamics: Developing quantitative models for the transition from standard Hawking evaporation to the memory-burdened phase. Calculating the expected properties (mass, spin, radiation rate) of potential black hole remnants and assessing their impact on computational function and long-term detectability.
• Saturon Analogues: Identifying and modeling more non-gravitational saturon candidates in accessible theories (QCD, condensed matter). Simulating their information dynamics to test universal principles relevant to black hole information processing and potentially guide experimental analogue efforts.
• Creation and Control Physics: Revisiting the energy thresholds for micro black hole creation, explicitly incorporating effects like large numbers of particle species (N_{sp}) beyond simple LED models. Developing theoretical frameworks for stable feeding and confinement mechanisms necessary for maintaining operational black hole computers.

Observational Strategies

1. Refined Technosignature Templates: Generating high-fidelity predictions for observable signals is paramount. This involves:

• Modeling Maintained BHs: Calculating the expected neutrino and gamma-ray spectra and light curves specifically for continuously fed, steady-state or quasi-steady-state micro black holes, rather than just relying on models of evaporating PBHs.
• Incorporating Physics: Including accurate greybody factors, secondary particle production cascades, potential photosphere effects that reprocess the spectrum , and modifications due to the memory burden effect on late-stage emission.

2. Targeted Observational Searches: Implementing searches using these refined templates:

• Current Instruments: Conducting dedicated analyses of archival and ongoing data from IceCube , Fermi-LAT , H.E.S.S./VERITAS/MAGIC , and HAWC. Searches should target potential point sources, localized excesses above background, or characteristic spectral features.
• Future Instruments: Planning search strategies for next-generation observatories like IceCube-Gen2 and CTA, which will offer significantly enhanced sensitivity.

3. Multimessenger Algorithms: Developing and deploying sophisticated algorithms for both real-time alerts and archival searches looking for temporal and spatial coincidences between neutrino and gamma-ray signals consistent with BH computer templates, leveraging networks like AMON.
4. Distinguishing Signatures: Establishing clear criteria to differentiate potential ETI BH signals from natural astrophysical phenomena. This includes comparing signals to PBH evaporation models (considering location relative to potential ETI habitats, persistence vs. transient nature, spectral details) and known astrophysical sources (spectral shape, variability, multiwavelength counterparts). Association with other potential technosignatures (e.g., waste heat) would strengthen any candidate signal.

Justification Arguments

1. Comparative Efficiency Analysis: Performing rigorous, quantitative analyses comparing the projected energy efficiency, resource requirements, and computational throughput of black hole computers against highly advanced conventional quantum computers and other speculative platforms like neutron star computronium. This will help delineate the regimes where BHs offer a decisive advantage.
2. Robustness of Convergence: Critically examining the universality and convergence arguments. Exploring plausible alternative physics scenarios or computational paradigms beyond the Standard Model and General Relativity to test whether the conclusion that black holes are the ultimate computational endpoint remains robust.
3. Refining the Fermi Paradox Connection: Integrating the constraints derived from technosignature searches (or potential detections) for black hole computers into quantitative models of the Fermi paradox. This involves assessing how the prevalence (or absence) of such signatures affects estimates of the number, longevity, and activity levels of advanced ETI in the galaxy or observable universe.

This research program is inherently interdisciplinary, linking fundamental theoretical physics (quantum gravity, information theory) with observational astroparticle physics and the broader goals of SETI. Progress in understanding the quantum nature of black holes directly informs the search for their technological use, while observational constraints provide crucial feedback for theoretical models and assessments of ETI prevalence. This synergy offers a powerful path forward, promising insights into both the cosmos and the potential for intelligence within it. Furthermore, the focus on detecting the physical byproducts of computation, rather than intentional signals, provides a search strategy potentially robust against unknown ETI motivations or communication preferences, relying instead on the assumption that advanced intelligence seeks to harness the laws of physics efficiently.

VIII. Conclusion

The hypothesis that advanced extraterrestrial intelligence might harness black holes as quantum computers represents a profound convergence of fundamental physics and astrobiological speculation. This report has surveyed the theoretical landscape underpinning this idea, tracing its roots from the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy and Hawking radiation to modern concepts like the information paradox resolution via islands, the quantum N-portrait, saturon theory, and the ER=EPR conjecture. These theoretical threads collectively weave a compelling narrative: black holes are not merely gravitational sinks but possess the maximum information storage capacity allowed by nature and are conjectured to process information at speeds reaching fundamental quantum limits. Their unique properties, arising from the interplay of general relativity and quantum mechanics, position them as the theoretical endpoint for computational efficiency.

The universality of the physical laws governing black holes suggests that any sufficiently advanced civilization, in its quest to push computational boundaries, might inevitably converge upon utilizing these objects. Models like the quantum N-portrait and the broader theory of saturons provide a microscopic basis for these properties, suggesting that the physics of maximal information processing is a generic feature constrained by unitarity, with black holes representing the most efficient gravitational realization. While the engineering challenges associated with creating and manipulating microscopic black holes are undeniably immense – likely requiring technology far beyond our own, characteristic of Kardashev Type II or III civilizations – the potential computational payoff could justify such efforts.

Crucially, this hypothesis is not purely theoretical; it offers potentially testable observational consequences. The Hawking radiation intrinsically linked to the operation (or even existence) of microscopic black holes would produce a flux of high-energy particles, primarily neutrinos and gamma rays. The “democratic” nature of this emission ensures that detectable standard model particles would be produced even if the ETI technology involves exotic physics. Recent theoretical work, notably by Dvali and Osmanov, has quantified the potential signatures, suggesting that current and upcoming astroparticle observatories like IceCube and CTA possess the sensitivity to probe plausible scenarios of ETI black hole computing activity in our galactic neighborhood or beyond. Null results from ongoing searches for primordial black hole evaporation already place meaningful constraints on this hypothesis, grounding it in empirical observation.

The research directions outlined herein – encompassing refined theoretical modeling of black hole quantum information processing and evaporation (including effects like memory burden), development of specific observational templates for maintained black hole computers, targeted multi-messenger searches, and rigorous comparative analyses of computational efficiency – provide a roadmap for future investigation. This endeavor promises dual benefits: advancing our fundamental understanding of quantum gravity and the black hole information paradox, while simultaneously opening a novel, physically motivated window in the search for extraterrestrial intelligence.

Ultimately, the concept of black hole computing challenges us to consider the furthest reaches of technological evolution guided by the known laws of physics. It shifts the focus of SETI, in part, from listening for intentional messages to searching for the inevitable physical byproducts of computation operating at the universe’s ultimate limits. The prospect, however remote, that we might one day detect the faint, high-energy whispers of Hawking radiation emanating not from a primordial relic, but from an artifact of advanced intelligence – recognizing an alien civilization through the signature of their ultimate computer – remains one of the most profound and tantalizing possibilities in modern science.

Works cited

1. Black holes as tools for quantum computing by advanced extraterrestrial civilizations – arXiv, https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.09575 2. Black holes as tools for quantum computing by advanced extraterrestrial civilizations, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/374774406_Black_holes_as_tools_for_quantum_computing_by_advanced_extraterrestrial_civilizations 3. Astrophysical constraints on the simulation hypothesis for this Universe: why it is (nearly) impossible that we live in a simulation – Frontiers, https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/physics/articles/10.3389/fphy.2025.1561873/full 4. Black holes as tools for quantum computing by advanced extraterrestrial civilizations | International Journal of Astrobiology – Cambridge University Press, https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/international-journal-of-astrobiology/article/black-holes-as-tools-for-quantum-computing-by-advanced-extraterrestrial-civilizations/08675176C9EF974F0A5A4A1D5AC81C90 5. Ultimate physical limits to computation, https://faculty.pku.edu.cn/_resources/group1/M00/00/0D/cxv0BF5mC6CALoznAAR9fsim1hM046.pdf 6. Black hole explosions as probes of new physics | Phys. Rev. D, https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.111.063006 7. Out of the box approach to Black hole Information paradox – arXiv, https://arxiv.org/html/2504.10429v1 8. www.imperial.ac.uk, https://www.imperial.ac.uk/media/imperial-college/research-centres-and-groups/theoretical-physics/msc/dissertations/2022/Imran-Abdul-Rahman-Dissertation.pdf 9. Island, Page curve, and superradiance of rotating BTZ black holes …, https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.105.066009 10. Black Hole’s Quantum N-Portrait | Request PDF – ResearchGate, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/51964408_Black_Hole’s_Quantum_N-Portrait 11. Memory Burden Effect in Black Holes and Solitons: Implications for PBH – arXiv, https://arxiv.org/html/2405.13117v1 12. Micro black hole – Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Micro_black_hole 13. Extra dimensions, gravitons, and tiny black holes – CERN, https://home.cern/science/physics/extra-dimensions-gravitons-and-tiny-black-holes 14. Quantum teleportation between simulated binary black holes – arXiv, https://arxiv.org/html/2503.10761v1 15. [0808.2096] 1 Complementarity – ar5iv – arXiv, https://ar5iv.labs.arxiv.org/html/0808.2096 16. [1401.3416] Wormholes and Entanglement – arXiv, https://arxiv.org/abs/1401.3416 17. Physicists Create a Wormhole Using a Quantum Computer | Quanta …, https://www.quantamagazine.org/physicists-create-a-wormhole-using-a-quantum-computer-20221130/ 18. Prospective sensitivity of CTA on detection of evaporating primordial black holes – arXiv, https://arxiv.org/html/2504.17478v1 19. Search for the evaporation of primordial black holes with H.E.S.S. – arXiv, https://arxiv.org/pdf/2303.12855 20. Science of the day 29: The limits of computation part 2 – Sapience, https://sapience2017.wordpress.com/2018/05/10/science-of-the-day-29-the-limits-of-computation-part-2/ 21. Holographic principle – Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holographic_principle 22. Modifying the Bekenstein Bound with Quantum State Complexity – ResearchGate, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/380876087_Modifying_the_Bekenstein_Bound_with_Quantum_State_Complexity 23. From Black Holes to Information Erasure: Uniting Bekenstein’s Bound and Landauer’s Principle – ResearchGate, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/372973881_From_Black_Holes_to_Information_Erasure_Uniting_Bekenstein’s_Bound_and_Landauer’s_Principle 24. Do They Compute? Dawn of a New Paradigm based on the Information-theoretic View of Black holes, Universe and Various Conceptual, https://turcomat.org/index.php/turkbilmat/article/download/1145/925/2096 25. Probing the particle spectrum of nature with evaporating black holes – SciPost, https://scipost.org/SciPostPhys.12.5.150/pdf 26. Primordial Black Holes: Observational Characteristics of The Final Evaporation – arXiv, https://arxiv.org/pdf/1510.04372 27. arXiv:2410.07604v3 [astro-ph.HE] 14 Mar 2025, http://arxiv.org/pdf/2410.07604 28. Multimessenger search for evaporating primordial black holes, https://serv.sao.ru/hq/grb/conf_2017/proc/Petkov_et_al.pdf 29. arXiv:2503.19227v1 [hep-ph] 25 Mar 2025, http://arxiv.org/pdf/2503.19227 30. high temperature matter and neutrino spectra from microscopic black holes – arXiv, https://arxiv.org/pdf/astro-ph/0211579 31. Observation of Stimulated Hawking Radiation in an Optical Analogue | Phys. Rev. Lett., https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.010404 32. Observation of Hawking Radiation and its Temperature in Analogue Black Hole, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/363456957_Observation_of_Hawking_Radiation_and_its_Temperature_in_Analogue_Black_Hole 33. Hawking Radiation and Analogue Experiments: A Bayesian Analysis – PhilSci-Archive, https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/16111/1/BayesianDumbhole%20Revised.pdf 34. Acoustic analog of Hawking radiation in quantized circular superflows of Bose-Einstein condensates | Phys. Rev. Research – Physical Review Link Manager, https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.043065 35. Observation of quantum Hawking radiation and its entanglement in an analogue black hole, https://inspirehep.net/literature/1395958 36. www.cs.cornell.edu, https://www.cs.cornell.edu/~ginsparg/top_jul2020.html 37. Black hole information paradox – Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_hole_information_paradox 38. Black Holes’ Information Paradox and It’s Complexity – NHSJS, https://nhsjs.com/2024/black-holes-information-paradox-and-its-complexity/ 39. Information recovery in the Hayden-Preskill protocol – arXiv, https://arxiv.org/pdf/2310.16988 40. [hep-th/0002044] TASI lectures on the Holographic Principle – arXiv, https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0002044 41. [2112.14848] Holographic CFT Phase Transitions and Criticality for Charged AdS Black Holes – arXiv, https://arxiv.org/abs/2112.14848 42. [2403.02864] Recent Developments in Holographic Black Hole Chemistry – arXiv, https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.02864 43. [2402.15913] Black holes thermodynamics with CFT re-scaling – arXiv, https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.15913 44. ER = EPR in nLab, https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/ER+%3D+EPR 45. [2305.03161] Holographic CFT Phase Transitions and Criticality for Rotating AdS Black Holes – arXiv, https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.03161 46. arXiv:1710.01175v1 [hep-th] 3 Oct 2017, https://arxiv.org/pdf/1710.01175 47. Computational Complexity of Quantum States & Spacetime Curvature – ResearchGate, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/382443438_Computational_Complexity_of_Quantum_States_Spacetime_Curvature 48. [quant-ph/9908043] Ultimate physical limits to computation – arXiv, https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/9908043 49. (PDF) Computation is Existence — A Brief Overview of the Multi-faceted Implications of Quantum Mechanical Description of Black holes as hyper computational Entities – ResearchGate, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/350803897_Computation_is_Existence_-_A_Brief_Overview_of_the_Multi-faceted_Implications_of_Quantum_Mechanical_Description_of_Black_holes_as_hyper_computational_Entities 50. Computronium, https://www.chemeurope.com/en/encyclopedia/Computronium.html 51. How could one confine a micro black hole? : r/AskPhysics – Reddit, https://www.reddit.com/r/AskPhysics/comments/1bap6ay/how_could_one_confine_a_micro_black_hole/ 52. arXiv:1403.1422v2 [hep-th] 13 Mar 2014, https://arxiv.org/pdf/1403.1422 53. arxiv.org, https://arxiv.org/pdf/2503.10761 54. Black Hole’s Quantum N-Portrait – arXiv, https://arxiv.org/pdf/1112.3359 55. (PDF) Scrambling in the Black Hole Portrait – ResearchGate, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/249011936_Scrambling_in_the_Black_Hole_Portrait 56. arXiv:1206.2365v1 [hep-th] 11 Jun 2012, https://arxiv.org/pdf/1206.2365 57. How special are black holes? Correspondence with objects saturating unitarity bounds in generic theories | Phys. Rev. D, https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.105.056013 58. [2302.08353] Saturon Dark Matter – arXiv, https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.08353 59. (PDF) Saturon Dark Matter – ResearchGate, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/368572526_Saturon_Dark_Matter 60. arXiv:2103.15668v1 [hep-th] 29 Mar 2021, https://arxiv.org/pdf/2103.15668 61. Black-Hole-Like Saturons in Gross-Neveu – arXiv, https://arxiv.org/pdf/2111.03620 62. Vortex Effects in Merging Black Holes and Saturons – arXiv, https://arxiv.org/html/2310.02288v2 63. Hayden-Preskill recovery in chaotic and integrable unitary circuit dynamics, https://quantum-journal.org/papers/q-2024-08-08-1434/ 64. Does Memory Burden Open a New Mass Window for Primordial Black Holes as Dark Matter? – arXiv, https://arxiv.org/html/2503.21005v1 65. Memory burden effect in black holes and solitons: Implications for …, https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.110.056029 66. Beyond Hawking evaporation of black holes formed by dark matter in compact stars – arXiv, https://arxiv.org/html/2410.22702v1 67. The impact of memory-burdened primordial black holes on high-scale leptogenesis – arXiv, https://arxiv.org/html/2501.06298v1 68. Happy Dvali – arXiv, https://arxiv.org/pdf/2410.22702 69. The Case For Black Hole Remnants: A Review – arXiv, https://arxiv.org/html/2412.00322v1 70. Prospective sensitivity of CTA on detection of evaporating primordial black holes – ResearchGate, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/391120396_Prospective_sensitivity_of_CTA_on_detection_of_evaporating_primordial_black_holes 71. arXiv:2202.02775v1 [hep-ph] 6 Feb 2022, https://arxiv.org/pdf/2202.02775 72. The microscopic black hole production at the LHC with the CMS experiment – CERN, https://s3.cern.ch/inspire-prod-files-a/a06bfd9470141491e193aaca33b4ce72 73. [hep-ph/0205024] Microscopic Black Hole Production in TeV-Scale Gravity – arXiv, https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0205024 74. [hep-ph/0112186] Black Hole Production in Large Extra Dimensions at the Tevatron: Possibility for a First Glimpse on TeV Scale Gravity – arXiv, https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0112186 75. Quantum vacuum fluctuations, the size of extra dimensions and mini black holes – arXiv, https://arxiv.org/pdf/gr-qc/0702142 76. Continuing the search for extra dimensions | ATLAS Experiment at CERN, https://atlas.cern/updates/briefing/continuing-search-extra-dimensions 77. The LHC’s extra dimension – CERN Courier, https://cerncourier.com/a/the-lhcs-extra-dimension/ 78. Black Holes at the Large Hadron Collider – Inspire HEP, https://inspirehep.net/literature/1335049 79. [0706.2050] Black Holes and Large N Species Solution to the Hierarchy Problem – arXiv, https://arxiv.org/abs/0706.2050 80. The Neverending Story of the Eternal Wormhole and the Noisy Sycamore – arXiv, https://arxiv.org/pdf/2301.03522 81. [1912.12424] General Relativistic Wormhole Connections from Planck-Scales and the ER = EPR Conjecture – arXiv, https://arxiv.org/abs/1912.12424 82. (PDF) ER=EPR and TGD – ResearchGate, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/335910004_EREPR_and_TGD 83. Sequestration and Stabilization: Taming the Black Hole by Patrick Dees, https://ufdcimages.uflib.ufl.edu/NC/FE/00/42/38/00001/Dees,%20P.pdf 84. Yudkowsky Contra Christiano On AI Takeoff Speeds – Astral Codex Ten, https://www.astralcodexten.com/p/yudkowsky-contra-christiano-on-ai 85. Review of the Safety of LHC Collisions – CERN, https://cern.ch/lsag/LSAG-Report.pdf 86. Universal construction of black hole microstates – Physical Review Link Manager, https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.109.086024 87. Physicists Say Aliens May Be Using Black Holes as Quantum Computers – Science Alert, https://www.sciencealert.com/physicists-say-aliens-may-be-using-black-holes-as-quantum-computers 88. (PDF) Calculation of the Emergent Spectrum and Observation of Primordial Black Holes, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/1814450_Calculation_of_the_Emergent_Spectrum_and_Observation_of_Primordial_Black_Holes 89. (PDF) Formation of a Hawking-radiation photosphere around microscopic black holes, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/1811683_Formation_of_a_Hawking-radiation_photosphere_around_microscopic_black_holes 90. IceCube Places Constraints on Neutrino Emission from the Brightest Gamma-ray Burst, https://research.gatech.edu/icecube-places-constraints-neutrino-emission-brightest-gamma-ray-burst 91. Black holes at the IceCube neutrino telescope | Phys. Rev. D, https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.75.024011 92. Search for tiny black holes puts tighter constraints on quantum gravity – Physics World, https://physicsworld.com/a/search-for-tiny-black-holes-puts-tighter-constraints-on-quantum-gravity/ 93. Ultra-High-Energy Neutrinos from Primordial Black Holes – arXiv, https://arxiv.org/html/2503.19227v1 94. Limits on primordial black hole evaporation from H.E.S.S. observations – Uniwersytet Jagielloński, https://ruj.uj.edu.pl/bitstreams/99f7ab19-066a-4cd6-8921-60c7225bf0f1/download 95. Limits on primordial black hole evaporation from H.E.S.S. observations – Inspire HEP, https://inspirehep.net/literature/1934429 96. Limits on Primordial Black Hole evaporation with the H.E.S.S. array of Cherenkov telescopes – Inspire HEP, https://inspirehep.net/literature/1243367 97. Multimessenger Gamma-Ray and Neutrino Coincidence Alerts Using HAWC and IceCube Subthreshold Data | Request PDF – ResearchGate, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/348332670_Multimessenger_Gamma-Ray_and_Neutrino_Coincidence_Alerts_Using_HAWC_and_IceCube_Subthreshold_Data?_tp=eyJjb250ZXh0Ijp7InBhZ2UiOiJzY2llbnRpZmljQ29udHJpYnV0aW9ucyIsInByZXZpb3VzUGFnZSI6bnVsbCwic3ViUGFnZSI6bnVsbH19 98. AMON, the Astrophysical Multimessenger Observatory Network – IceCube, https://icecube.wisc.edu/news/research/2015/07/amon-astrophysical-multimessenger-observatory-network/ 99. arXiv:1912.01317v1 [astro-ph.HE] 3 Dec 2019, https://arxiv.org/pdf/1912.01317 100. How neutron stars are like (and unlike) black holes | ScienceDaily, https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/03/140325094429.htm 101. Do neutron star collisions produce black holes? – Universe Today, https://www.universetoday.com/articles/do-neutron-star-collisions-produce-black-holes 102. Computronium and Time Dilation and Bremermann’s Limit – Physics Stack Exchange, https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/407658/computronium-and-time-dilation-and-bremermanns-limit 103. New Space Simulations Show What Happens When Neutron Star, Black Hole Collide, https://newscenter.lbl.gov/2017/08/02/new-space-simulations-neutron-star-black-hole-mergers/ 104. Neutron Star Weigh-In – Physical Review Link Manager, https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevFocus.15.21 105. Glossary – What is Intelligence? | Antikythera, https://whatisintelligence.antikythera.org/glossary/ 106. Can Intelligence Explode? – arXiv, https://arxiv.org/pdf/1202.6177 107. (PDF) The Physics of Information Processing Superobjects: . . . – ResearchGate, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/277290585_The_Physics_of_Information_Processing_Superobjects 108. The Transcension Hypothesis: Sufficiently Advanced Civilizations Invariably Leave Our Universe, with Implications for METI and SETI. – SlideShare, https://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/the-transcension-hypothesis-sufficiently-advanced-civilizations-invariably-leave-our-universe-with-implications-for-meti-and-seti/266074313 109. The Transcension Hypothesis: Sufficiently Advanced Civilizations Invariably Leave Our Universe, and Implications for METI and SETI., https://accelerating.org/articles/Smart-2012-TranscensionHypothesis-ActaAstronautica(withUpdates).pdf 110. (PDF) The transcension hypothesis: Sufficiently advanced civilizations invariably leave our universe, and implications for METI and SETI – ResearchGate, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/256935188_The_transcension_hypothesis_Sufficiently_advanced_civilizations_invariably_leave_our_universe_and_implications_for_METI_and_SETI 111. The Transcension Hypothesis, John M. Smart, 2011 – Acceleration Studies Foundation, https://accelerating.org/articles/transcensionhypothesis.html 112. [2503.21740] Transitioning to Memory Burden: Detectable Small Primordial Black Holes as Dark Matter – arXiv, https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.21740